Manufacturers Index - Niles Tool Works
Niles Tool Works
Cincinnati, OH; Hamilton, OH, U.S.A.
Manufacturer Class:
Metal Working Machinery & Steam and Gas Engines
This page contains information on patents issued to this manufacturer.
Submitting Patent Information
If you find a patent number or patent date by this manufacturer that is not on this
list, please contact the Site Historian.
Key to Links for Patent Information
USPTO = U.S. Patent Office .
Images of the actual patent can be viewed on the U.S. Patent Office web site but
a special TIFF viewer must be installed with your browser in order properly work.
More information on how to configure your computer to view these patents can be
found at TIFF image Viewers
for Patent Images.
DATAMP = Directory of American Tool And
Machinery Patents . A sister site to VintageMachinery.org with information
on patents related to machinery and tools. A much easier user interface than the
USPTO's for finding information on machinery patents.
97,908
|
Dec. 14, 1869
|
Improved radial drilling-machine
|
George A. Gray Jr. |
Cincinnati, OH |
Frank Millward - patent attorney
|
113,651
|
Apr. 11, 1871
|
Improvement in turning and boring-mills
|
George A. Gray Jr. |
Cincinnati, OH |
|
114,670
|
May. 09, 1871
|
Improvement in Railroad Car-Axle Lathes
|
George A. Gray Jr. |
Cincinnati, Hamilton County, OH |
|
138,394
|
Apr. 29, 1873
|
Machines for Turning Pulleys
|
George A. Gray Jr. |
Hamilton, Butler County, OH |
|
241,719
|
May. 17, 1881
|
Boring Mill
|
George T. Reiss |
Hamilton, Butler County, OH |
|
258,533
|
May. 23, 1882
|
Adjusting-gearing
|
Alexander Gordon |
Cincinnati, OH |
This is the earliest instantiation we can find for the "sensitive drill" friction-drive mechanism, which has a metal disk mounted on the end of the input shaft, and a rubber disk at right angles and connected to the output shaft. The rim of the rubber disk rubs against the metal disk, and is forced to rotate when the metal disk rotates. The rubber disk can be moved longitudinally along its shaft (which coincides with a diameter of the metal disk), varying the speed of the rubber disk's rotation. If the rubber disk crosses the center point of the metal disk then its rotations stops and reverses. As a method of power transmission, the idea is an old one, and this patent does not cover that idea per se. Therefore, it is quite possible that there are older versions of this drill press design. |
|
|
Adjusting-gearing
|
George T. Reiss |
Hamilton, OH |
|
263,334
|
Aug. 29, 1882
|
Lathe Rest
|
Alexander Gordon |
Cincinnati, Hamilton County, OH |
James W. See - patent attorney
This invention pertains to follow-rests, center-rests, and shafting-rests for lathes.
We claim as our invention;
1. In a lathe-rest to receive collars having a cylindrical exterior, the combination of a collar-bearing having an admission gap or throat arranged at an angle of about forty-five degrees, and a vertical set-screw arranged over the axis of said bearing, substantially as and for the purpose set forth.
2. In a lathe-rest, the combination of a bottom bearing for the collar, a vertical set-screw arranged over the axis of the collar, and a divided collar having a tongue-and-groove joint, substantially as and for the purpose set forth.
|
|
|
Lathe Rest
|
James W. See |
Hamilton, Butler County, OH |
|
267,026
|
Nov. 07, 1882
|
Screw Cutting Lathe
|
James W. See |
Hamilton, Butler County, OH |
The patent lists the assignee as "Miles Tool Works:. We believe that this is a misprint for Niles Tool Works. |
273,313
|
Mar. 06, 1883
|
Metal Screw Machine
|
George T. Reiss |
Hamilton, Butler County, OH |
|
292,948
|
Feb. 05, 1884
|
Pulley Lathe
|
George T. Reiss |
Hamilton, Butler County, OH |
|
322,969
|
Jul. 28, 1885
|
Drilling-machine
|
George T. Reiss |
Hamilton, OH |
This machine simultaneously drills the wholes in a rail-car wheel. |
334,538
|
Jan. 19, 1886
|
Lathe for Turning Shafting
|
Walter J. Muncaster |
Cumberland, Allegheny County, MD |
Abstract:
In order that the objects and advantages of the present invention may be the better understood, I shall state some of the difficulties met with in existing machinery of this class, and then explain the manner in which the same are avoided. Ordinarily, the shaft to be turned is mounted upon the centers of the head and tail stocks, and the end nearest the headstock is connected and caused to rotate with the faceplate thereof by a lathe-dog. Under such arrangement the tailstock center, being stationary, is ground and worn away by the rotation of the shaft thereon, and the shaft being driven from one end only is apt to spring or twist, unless very heavy, thus greatly interfering with the speed and accuracy of the work. Heretofore it has been necessary also to dismount the shaft when the cutting-tools neared the dog, reverse the shaft end for end, carry the tools back, and finish the portion previously held by the dog. To obviate these o difficulties, I provide a faceplate for the tail stock, as well as for the head stock, and employ a dog at each end of the shaft, and provide means for driving both faceplates alike, so that the shaft is turned with equal power at both ends, and that when the tools approach the dog at either end said dog can be removed and the tools ran clear to the end of the shaft, while the latter is driven from the opposite end. To further provide for this full travel of the tools, I employ a separable dog having two tails of more than ordinary length, the extra length being necessitated by a similar extension of the lathe-centers to give room for the tools between the faceplates and the ends of the shafts. Under this plan it is not necessary to reverse the shaft end for end to finish it, and it is therefore unnecessary to run the tool stock or carriage back for that purpose. Under existing plans, however, the tool stock or carriage must be run back: with each new shaft, because the tools can work only one way. To avoid this necessity. I so construct and arrange the tool stock that it may be swung horizontally about a central pivot on the carriage, and the tools thus made to work back to the starting-point, the lathe being of course reversed with each reversal of the tool stock.
Claim:
The combination, in a lathe, of a frame, a headstock provided with a face-plate, a tailstock provided with a face-plate, a shaft carrying a pinion in mesh with the faceplate of the head-stock, a sleeve mounted upon the shaft and carrying a pinion in mesh with the faceplate of the tail-stock, said sleeve adapted to slide upon the shaft, but to rotate only in unison therewith, and an arm projecting from the tailstock and having the sleeve loosely journaled in it, whereby the sleeve and its pinion are maintained always in fixed relation to the faceplate of the tailstock. In a lathe, the combination of a frame, A, a head-stock, B, provided with a face-plate, D, a tail-stock, X, provided with a face-plate, I', a shaft, F, provided with a pinion, E, meshing with faceplate D, a sleeve, G', encircling and adapted to slide upon the shaft F, a pinion, 112, carried by said sleeve and meshing with faceplate I', and an arm, J', swiveled upon the spindle Y of the tail-stock, and having the sleeve G' journaled in it. |
334,832
|
Jan. 26, 1886
|
Car Wheel Lathe
|
John Richardson Williams |
Chicago, Cook County, IL |
|
340,207
|
Apr. 20, 1886
|
Lathe
|
Alexander Gordon |
Hamilton, Butler County, OH |
|
344,082
|
Jun. 22, 1886
|
Metal Planing Machine
|
James K. Cullen |
Hamilton, OH |
James W. See - patent attorney |
344,083
|
Jun. 22, 1886
|
Gaging Device for Car Wheel Lathes
|
James K. Cullen |
Hamilton, Butler County, OH |
|
|
|
Gaging Device for Car Wheel Lathes
|
James W. See |
Hamilton, Butler County, OH |
|
344,580
|
Jun. 29, 1886
|
Lathe
|
William W. Hubbard |
Philadelphia, PA |
Abstract:
My invention consists of the combination, with a lathe, of an attachment whereby objects of larger diameter can be turned, bored, or otherwise worked than can be done on the lathe itself.
Claim:
A lathe having a, main spindle and provided with a supplementary spindle having a faceplate at right angles to the main spindle, and gears connecting the two spindles. |
361,648
|
Apr. 19, 1887
|
Driving Dog for Lathes
|
George T. Reiss |
Hamilton, Butler County, OH |
Abstract:
This invention pertains to a driver to be attached to the faceplate of a lathe and project therefrom to engage and drive the work to be turned. The invention has been devised with special reference to the turning of steel-tired car-wheels, which are fastened upon their axles.
(5) Such wheels are generally built up with web- plates secured together by numerous bolts through the web of the wheel, and the driving is generally done through the medium of one or more of these bolts, or of holes from which the bolts are removed.
Claim:
A lathe-driver fitted for attachment to a faceplate and provided at its outer end with a radial slot, and a thimble disposed loosely in said slot and having a central hole adapted to engage over a bolt-head, nut, or other projection from the face of the work to be driven combined substantially. |
362,618
|
May. 10, 1887
|
Drilling-machine
|
Alexander Gordon |
Hamilton, OH |
|
364,307
|
Jun. 07, 1887
|
Lathe
|
James W. See |
Hamilton, Butler County, OH |
|
406,003
|
Jun. 25, 1889
|
Turret-lathe
|
George T. Reiss |
Hamilton, OH |
|
430,088
|
Jun. 10, 1890
|
Lathe
|
George T. Reiss |
Hamilton, OH |
"This invention pertains to improvements in that class of lathes designed for operation on the driving-wheels of locomotives..." |
462,792
|
Nov. 10, 1891
|
Feed Mechanism for Lathes
|
Zorester B. Coes |
Hamilton, Butler County, OH |
|
525,444
|
Sep. 04, 1894
|
Chuck
|
Zorester B. Coes |
Hamilton, Butler County, OH |
|
527,140
|
Oct. 09, 1894
|
Taper Turning Tool for Lathes
|
Zorester B. Coes |
Hamilton, Butler County, OH |
|
532,766
|
Jan. 22, 1895
|
Taper Turning Tool for Lathes
|
Zorester B. Coes |
Hamilton, Butler County, OH |
|
535,486
|
Mar. 12, 1895
|
Taper Turning Tool for Lathes
|
Zorester B. Coes |
Hamilton, Butler County, OH |
|
535,487
|
Mar. 12, 1895
|
Turret Lathe
|
Zorester B. Coes |
Hamilton, Butler County, OH |
|
547,740
|
Oct. 08, 1895
|
Milling-machine
|
George T. Reiss |
Hamilton, OH |
|
|
|
Milling-machine
|
John B. Crockre |
Hamilton, OH |
|
570,093
|
Oct. 27, 1896
|
Metal Planing Machine
|
Henry Hess |
Hamilton, Butler County, OH |
|
579,976
|
Apr. 06, 1897
|
Reciprocating metal-paring machine
|
Alexander Gordon |
Hamilton, OH |
|
713,614
|
Nov. 18, 1902
|
Tool Relief for Metal Planers
|
Adolph L. De Leeuw |
Hamilton, Butler County, OH |
|
721,942
|
Mar. 03, 1903
|
Electric Switch System
|
Adolph L. De Leeuw |
Hamilton, Butler County, OH |
|
723,840
|
Mar. 31, 1903
|
Controlling Switch System
|
Adolph L. De Leeuw |
Hamilton, Butler County, OH |
|
764,115
|
Jul. 05, 1904
|
Speed Changer
|
Adolph L. De Leeuw |
Hamilton, Butler County, OH |
|
D140,986
|
Apr. 24, 1945
|
Design for a boring machine
|
Otto E. Schurr |
Hamilton, OH |
General Machinery Corp. employed a whopping 4500 people at the time, building artillery pieces, tanks, diesel engines, etc., for the war effort. The company was a merged organization that included the former Niles Tool Works, which had been acquired from Niles-Bement-Pond Co. |
|